Passive Activity Rules for Trusts
Rental Property in a Trust
If you own rental real estate through a trust, the losses from that property may not be deductible the way you’d expect. The passive activity rules treat trusts more strictly than individuals, and the difference can cost real money every year the losses sit unused.
Last reviewed
Why it’s different in a trust
When you own rental property personally, there is a built-in safety valve: you can deduct up to $25,000 of rental losses against your other income each year, as long as you actively participate in managing the property (and your adjusted gross income is below the phase-out threshold). Most hands-on landlords qualify for this.
Trusts do not get this $25,000 allowance. The tax code limits it to “natural persons,” with a limited extension to estates for two years after death. A trust is not a natural person. So when the same rental property sits inside a trust, the losses are “suspended”: they carry forward year after year and can only be used against passive income. They cannot offset the trust’s interest income, dividend income, capital gains, or any other non-passive income.
This doesn’t mean the losses are lost. They’re waiting. But they may wait for a long time.
Grantor trust vs. non-grantor trust
The first question is what kind of trust holds the property.
Grantor trust. If you created a revocable trust (or certain irrevocable trusts where you are still treated as the owner for income tax purposes), the rental income and losses flow to your personal tax return. The passive activity rules apply to you as an individual, and you may qualify for the $25,000 allowance based on your own participation. The trust-specific restrictions do not apply because, for income tax purposes, the IRS treats you as owning the property directly.
Non-grantor trust. If the trust is irrevocable and you are no longer treated as the tax owner, the trust is its own taxpayer. The rental income and losses stay on the trust’s Form 1041, and the stricter rules kick in: no $25,000 allowance, and the question of whose participation counts becomes complicated.
When the losses come off the shelf
Suspended passive losses become fully deductible in two situations:
- The trust sells the property. When the trust disposes of the rental property in a fully taxable sale, all accumulated suspended losses from that property are released. They become deductible in the year of sale, even against non-passive income. This is often the single biggest tax event for a trust with rental real estate
- The trust terminates. If the trust winds down and distributes its remaining assets to the beneficiaries, the suspended losses can pass through to the beneficiaries as part of the trust’s final-year deductions. But there’s a catch: the losses keep their “passive” label. The beneficiary can only use them against their own passive income, not against wages, salaries, or portfolio income
The material participation question
There is a potential argument for treating a trust’s rental activity as non-passive, but the law here is genuinely unsettled.
In 2014, the Tax Court ruled in Frank Aragona Trust v. Commissioner that a trust could materially participate in its real estate activities through the hands-on involvement of its individual trustees. If the trust qualifies for “real estate professional” status through its trustees, the rental activity is no longer automatically passive, and the losses may be deductible against other income.
However, the IRS has not accepted this decision. The regulations have not been updated to reflect it. If the trust takes this position, it may face scrutiny. The strength of the position depends on who the trustees are and how actively they are involved in the real estate operations.
This is not a do-it-yourself determination. It requires careful analysis of the trust’s structure, the trustees’ activities, and the specific facts.
Should the property stay in the trust?
The passive activity disadvantage sometimes leads people to ask: should I just take the property out of the trust?
Usually, the answer is that the trust serves other purposes that outweigh the passive activity cost:
- Estate planning. An irrevocable trust keeps the property out of your taxable estate. Removing it could pull it back in
- Asset protection. Trust property is generally beyond the reach of your personal creditors
- Management continuity. The trust ensures the property is managed according to your wishes if you become incapacitated or after you die
The better approach is usually to plan around the passive activity rules rather than undo the estate plan. Coordinating property sales with years when the trust has passive income, structuring the trust with individual trustees who are active in property management, and planning for trust termination can all help.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why can’t my trust deduct rental losses the way I can on my personal return?
Individuals who actively manage rental property can deduct up to $25,000 in rental losses against other income each year (subject to income phase-outs). Trusts do not get this allowance. The statute limits it to natural persons. So a trust with the same rental property and the same losses faces a worse result: the losses are suspended and can only offset passive income. This is one of the most significant tax differences between owning rental property personally and owning it through a trust.
Does it matter whether my trust is a grantor trust or not?
Yes, it matters a lot. If you created a trust and it is treated as a grantor trust (meaning you are still treated as the owner for income tax purposes), the rental income and losses are reported on your individual return, not the trust’s. The passive activity rules apply to you as an individual, which means you may be able to use the $25,000 allowance and apply your own hours of participation. If the trust is a non-grantor trust (an irrevocable trust where you are not the tax owner), the trust is its own taxpayer and the stricter rules apply.
What happens to the suspended losses when the trust sells the property?
When the trust sells the rental property in a fully taxable sale, all of the suspended passive losses from that property are released and become deductible in the year of sale. This is often the event that finally unlocks years of accumulated losses. The timing of the sale can be significant: if the trust has other income in the year of sale, the released losses can offset it.
Should I move rental property out of the trust?
That depends on why the property is in the trust in the first place. Trusts provide estate planning benefits (keeping assets out of your taxable estate), asset protection, and management continuity. Removing property from the trust just to get better passive activity treatment may undermine those benefits. The better approach is usually to plan around the passive activity rules, for example by coordinating the sale of loss properties with years when the trust has passive income, or by structuring the trust so that individual trustees can demonstrate material participation. Talk to your estate planning attorney and tax advisor before moving property out of a trust.
Related services
Grantor Trusts
If the trust is a grantor trust, the passive activity rules apply to you personally, not the trust.
Individual Tax Return (1040)
Your personal return, where grantor trust rental income and losses are reported.
Investment Returns
Rental income, capital gains, and passive activity coordination across your holdings.